- Would you consider using any third party libraries or techniques that could support the implementation?
- No, nothing third-party here either. CSS Grid does all the heavy lifting — the desktop 4×2 layout and the per-variant card placement are just Tailwind grid utilities (col-span, row-span, col-start, row-start), and making it responsive was mostly a case of scoping those placement classes to the lg breakpoint so the cards drop to two columns on tablet and a single one on mobile. The cards themselves — the type, the image handling, the gradient overlay on the image cards — are built from Tailwind plus the primitives the project already has (Text, NextImage, Button). The only real config is a small TypeScript file describing the slot layout for each variant, which felt cleaner than pulling in a grid library for what's basically a fixed set of arrangements.
- Sitecore frontend implementation (HTML, CSS/Sass and/or JS as needed) of the grid module and its variants based on how you interpret the module specification.
- The way I read it, the grid module is a rendering with a module-level datasource plus a nested set of cards.
At the module level there's a handful of fields: Title as Single-Line Text (the <h2> in the header), Subtitle as Single-Line Text for the little eyebrow above it, Description as Multi-Line or Rich Text shown next to the CTA, and Link as a General Link bound to the secondary "View all" button. The cards come from a Multilist or Treelist of child items — one item per card — and the frontend just takes the first N of them depending on the variant (2, 3, 4 or 5).
Each card item carries its own fields: Title (the <h3>), Subtitle for the eyebrow, an Image, Author, Date and a Link. The whole card is wrapped in that link, and the footer shows author | date with a chevron on the right.
For the variants I'd go one of two ways: four separate renderings, or — probably nicer for authors — a single rendering with a "Card count" parameter (2, 3, 4 or 5). Either way the datasource shape stays the same; all that changes is how many cards get consumed and which slot map is used. I deliberately tied a card's visual style to its slot rather than to an author field, so "image card with a text panel", "text-only card" and "full-bleed image with an overlay" are decided by where the card sits in the layout, not by something the author has to pick.
Structurally it's a <section> with a header (subtitle, title, description + link) and a CSS grid underneath. On desktop that's the 4×2 arrangement; on narrower screens it collapses to two columns and then a single one. Every cell is a card <article> inside an <a>. The first card type splits vertically — image across the top half, a content panel (#f2f2f3) below. The second is that same panel but text only. The third is a full-bleed background image with a top-to-bottom gradient so the white text at the bottom stays readable.
Styling is all Tailwind — the grid, spacing, colours and the overlay (bg-linear-to-b from-transparent to-black/70). The card background is a token (--color-grid-card: #f2f2f3) defined in @theme. I didn't reach for Sass; tokens and utilities covered it, though I'd happily switch if the wider project standardised on it.
There's very little JavaScript in play. Which variant renders is resolved at render time from the rendering parameter — or simply from which rendering the author placed — and the same mock datasource can drive all four variants, with the variant component feeding the first N cards into its layout config.
In a headless/JSS setup the component receives a fields object — { Title, Subtitle, Description, Link, Cards[] } — matching the Sitecore field JSON and maps each piece onto the shared primitives. In an SXA/MVC setup the equivalent Razor partials would output the same grid structure and classes.